Ex parte HOU et al. - Page 3




                     Appeal No. 1997-0646                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/383,667                                                                                                                                            


                     stabilizer for thermodynamically stabilizing said first                                                                                                           
                     plurality of partcles and said second plurality of particles,                                                                                                     
                     wherein said stabilizer is selected from the group consisting                                                                                                     
                     of homopolymers, copolymers, graft polymers, block polymers,                                                                                                      
                     and natural high molecular weight compounds.                                                                                                                      

                                                                            THE REFERENCE2                                                                                             
                     Carter et al. (Carter)          4,093,534          Jun. 6,                                                                                                        
                     1978                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                            THE REJECTIONS                                                                                             
                                Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                                                                                  
                     paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly                                                                                                        
                     point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which                                                                                                           
                     appellants regard as their invention.  Claims 1, 3, 5-13, 15,                                                                                                     
                     22-26 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                                                                        
                     unpatentable over Carter.                                                                                                                                         
                                                                                   OPINION                                                                                             
                                We have carefully considered all of the arguments                                                                                                      
                     advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with                                                                                                            


                                2 The examiner refers to disclosures in Chang                                                                                                          
                     (U.S. 4,285,801) and Müller et al. (U.S. 4,298,448)                                                                                                               
                     (answer, pages 6 and 10-13).  These references are not                                                                                                            
                     included in the statement of the rejection and, therefore, are                                                                                                    
                     not properly before us.  See In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341, 1342                                                                                                      
                     n.3, 166 USPQ 406, 407 n.3 (CCPA 1970).                                                                                                                           
                                                                                          3                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007