Appeal No. 97-0780
Application 08/330,265
11, we also sustain the rejection of these dependent claims which are not separately
argued.
In summary, the examiner’s rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
sustained with respect to claims 11, 14, 15, 17 and 18 but is not sustained with respect to
claims 1-10, 12, 13, 16, 19 and 20. Accordingly the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1-20 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may
be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
JOHN C. MARTIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007