Ex parte NAKAMURA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-0837                                                        
          Application 08/121,116                                                      


          and an output;                                                              
          (b) a plurality of photoelectric conversion elements, each                  
          corresponding to one of the plurality of neuron MOSFETS;                    
          (c) each neuron MOSFET having its primary input gate coupled                
          to its corresponding photoelectric conversion element and having            
          each of its secondary input gates coupled to a different one of             
          the plurality of photoelectric conversion elements;                         
          (d) a smoothed output;                                                      
          (e) a first switch coupled to the output of each of the                     
          plurality of neuron MOSFETs for selectively coupling each of the            
          plurality of neuron MOSFETs to the smoothed output of the image             
          sensor.                                                                     
          The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                   
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Ingham et al. (Ingham)         3,643,215           Feb. 15, 1972            
          Holmes et al. (Holmes)         3,944,977           Mar. 16, 1976            
          Umeda et al. (Umeda)           4,831,658           May  16, 1989            
          Shibata et al. (Shibata)       5,258,657           Nov. 02, 1993            
          (filed Jan. 06, 1992)                                                       
          System Issues in the Implementation of Sensory Neural Network               
          Photodetector Arrays, Robert B. Darling, et al. (Darling), IEEE             
          Pacific Rim Conference on Communications; May 9-10, 1991.                   
          Claims 4-8, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                  
          as unpatentable over Darling in view of Shibata and Umeda.                  
          Claims 15-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                        
          unpatentable over Darling in view of Shibata, Umeda and Holmes.             
          Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable               
          over Darling in view of Shibata, Umeda and Ingham.                          
          The respective positions of the examiner and the appellant                  

                                            2                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007