THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEN HASHIMOTO, IZURU MATSUI,
TOSHITAKE YUI and FUMINORI KOIDE
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1004
Application No. 08/095,4791
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
TORCZON, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 6,
8 and 10-21, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
Application for patent filed July 23, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a1
continuation of application serial number 07/737,900, filed Jul. 26, 1991, which is a continuation of
application serial number 07/487,051, filed Mar. 5, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007