THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YUICHI KASHIMURA, YUTAKA TAKAKU, and TOSHIO ISHII
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1071
Application No. 08/350,1191
____________
HEARD: September 15, 1999
____________
Before KRASS, MARTIN, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2, and 5 through 15. Claims 2 and 3
have been canceled. Claim 4 is objected to as depending from
a rejected base claim.
The appellants' invention relates to a method and
apparatus for diagnosing a misfire in a multi-cylinder engine
Application for patent filed November 29, 1994.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007