Ex parte GILLIS et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 97-1143                                                          
          Application 08/115,881                                                      


                    (3) wheel sets, including a front wheel set located               
                    generally below the bottom step, a center set                     
                    located below the center of the base, and a rear set              
                    located generally below the vertical rear legs.                   
                    (emphasis added)                                                  
          The wheels (27) are referred to throughout appellants'                      
          specification as the "center wheels" and beam (25) on which                 
          the                                                                         
          center wheels are mount is referred to as the "center beam"                 
          (page 6).  Original claim 1 called for "a second wheel set                  
          mounted on                                                                  
          said base between the front and rear thereof."  Original claim              
          6 called for the second wheel set to be mounted on a "center                
          beam mechanism."                                                            
               On November 30, 1994, appellants filed an amendment                    
          (Paper No. 6) to claim 1 changing "a second wheel set mounted               
          on said base between the front and rear thereof" to read --a                
          second wheel set mounted on said base approximately midway                  
          between the front and rear thereof--.  Claims 10 and 11 were                
          also added including similar language.  The accompanying                    
          "Remarks" stated that no new matter had been entered by the                 
          amendment and that the amendment was supported by the original              
          specification and claims.  However,                                         
                                         14                                           





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007