THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAMES M. PACHENCE, SALLY FRENKEL
and DAVID MENCHE
__________
Appeal No. 97-1192
Application 08/385,2901
___________
HEARD: July 15, 1999
___________
Before McQUADE, GONZALES and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
James M. Pachence et al. appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1, 3, 4 and 6 through 10. Claims 2 and 5, which
have been indicated by the examiner as containing allowable
subject matter, stand objected to as depending from rejected
1Application for patent filed February 10, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007