Appeal No. 97/1235
Application No. 08/316,717
CUILLE 3,030,266 Apr. 17,
1962
WINGARDH 3,717,274 Feb. 20,
1973
SONDEL 3,739,827 Jun. 19,
1973
MCCLINTON 4,296,859 Oct.
27, 1981
WHITE (Great Britain) 708,813 May 12, 1954
PHILLIPS (Great Britain) 922,317 Mar. 27,
1963
REJECTIONS
Claim 118 through 128 and 130 through 149 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. §103 as unpatentable over Phillips in view of
any of Wingardh, McClinton, White or Sondel. According to the
examiner, Phillips discloses a water soluble envelope having a
flexible wall and containing a pesticide. The examiner is
further of the view that the secondary references disclose
disposing an envelope within an outer container and leaving a
space between the outer container and the envelope. The
examiner is also of the view that the recited relative
humidity within the sealed outer container falls within the
ambient range of relative humidity and would occur inherently
in a closed, sealed container that was prepared under ambient
conditions.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007