THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KENT D. HARRISON,
SCOTT P. THOME,
PETER T. KEITH,
DANIEL O. ADAMS,
and WILLIAM H. PENNY
_____________
Appeal No. 97-1313
Application 07/931,6951
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 14 and 16 to 25. Claim 15 has been
1Application for patent filed August 18, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/830,479, filed February 4, 1992, which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 07/398,756, filed August 25, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007