Ex parte HARRISON et al. - Page 4




                     Appeal No. 97-1313                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 07/931,695                                                                                                                                            


                     same as, or an equivalent of, the corresponding structure described in appellants' specification within                                                           

                     the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph (brief, pages 41 to 43; reply brief, pages 4 to 5).  The                                                          

                     Examiner responds that (answer, page 10):                                                                                                                         

                                both end cap 57 [sic: 37] of Frisbie et al. and stop ring 138 of the present invention are                                                             
                                alternative mechanisms for preventing the distal movement of the trapping member                                                                       
                                (balloon) relative to the guide catheter.                                                                                                              

                                In appellants' specification, the structure which corresponds to the claimed "means for                                                                

                     preventing" is a stop ring 138 which is located at the connection between the proximal and distal                                                                 

                     portions 133, 134 of the shaft 132 of the captivation catheter 130 (page 27, lines 10 to 17).  As                                                                 

                     disclosed at page 30, lines 12 to 25:              4                                                                                                              

                                With the embodiment of FIGS. 9 and 10, the captivation catheter 130 is positioned                                                                      
                                in the guide catheter 22.  Positioning of the captivation catheter 130 is facilitated by the                                                           
                                stop ring 138  . . . The physician advances the captivation catheter 130 into the guide                                                                
                                catheter 22 until the distal end of the captivation catheter is at the distal portion of the                                                           
                                guide catheter but not beyond it.  The stop ring 138 is sized such that it will not fit into                                                           
                                the guide catheter manifold port and therefore the captivation catheter 130 cannot be                                                                  
                                advanced so far into the guide catheter 22 that the inflatable balloon 131 extends past                                                                
                                the distal end of the guide catheter.                                                                                                                  

                     On the other hand, the apparatus identified by the examiner as being the "means for preventing" in the                                                            


                                4The language used in claim 1 to describe the function of the "means for preventing," i.e., "for                                                       
                     preventing the distal end . . . when inserted therein," does not appear in the specification.  Although we                                                        
                     believe that this function is sufficiently described by the quoted portion of page 30 to comply with 35                                                           
                     U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, the specification should be amended so that there is clear antecedent                                                              
                     basis as required by 37 C.F.R. § 1.75(d)(1).                                                                                                                      

                                                                                          4                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007