Appeal No. 1997-1381
Application 08/188,925
this application includes the element discussed above that
links initiating compression of data upon detection of
trouble, i.e., a
jam. Since Maniwa does not teach this limitation, we will not
sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of any claims.
Since the Examiner has not indicated this limitation to
be obvious over Maniwa and/or Hirata, we will not sustain the
35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of any claims.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21,
23, 27, 29, 30 and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007