Ex parte WILLIAMS - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-1397                                                        
          Application 08/411,245                                                      


          in claim language automatically renders a claim indefinite.                 
          However, definiteness problems often arise when words of                    
          degree are used in a claim.  In such a case, it must be                     
          decided whether one of ordinary skill in the art would                      
          understand what is claimed when the claim is                                




          read in light of the specification.  Seattle Box Co. v.                     
          Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., 731 F.2d 818, 826, 221                  
          USPQ 568, 574 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                             
               The language of the claims questioned by the examiner is               
          (1) the recitation in claim 11 that the vibrations are                      
          generated for a predetermined time period which is “many times              
          greater” than the time required for vibrational wave energy to              
          be reflected back to the earth’s surface from the deepest                   
          subsurface earth formation of interest, and (2) the recitation              
          in claim 11 that the recording of the seismic signals begins                
          after a “relatively short delay time” that is approximately                 
          equal to the time required for vibrational energy to be                     
          reflected back to the earth’s surface from the deepest                      


                                         -4-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007