Appeal No. 1997-1413
Application 07/765,757
and
an output device attached to said body, responsive to
said display, and operable to record said information onto
said photographic media, thereby superimposing said
information onto said image.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Hattori 4,330,186 May 18, 1982
Sakurada et al. (Sakurada) 4,449,805 May 22, 1984
Ishii et al. (Ishii) 4,742,369 May 03, 1988
Johnston et al. (Johnston) 4,814,760 Mar. 21, 1989
Arifuku et al. (Arifuku) 5,103,250 Apr. 07, 1992
(filed July 02,
1990)
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 10, 17, 18 and 40 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings
of Sakurada in view of Johnston and Arifuku.
2. Claims 1, 6, 13, 14, 17, 40 and 41 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings
of Ishii in view of Johnston and Arifuku.
3. Claims 1, 6, 17 and 40 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Hattori in view of Johnston and Arifuku.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007