Appeal No. 97-1585 Application No. 08/397,514 forming each individual pixel by activating said switchable elements such that each individual pixel is formed by a plurality of said switchable elements and the intensity of each said pixel is controlled by the amount of time said switchable elements are in an ON state. No references were relied on by the examiner. Claims 15 and 17 stand rejected under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 for lack of written description. According to the examiner (Answer, pages 3 and 4): Claims 15 and 17 claim that each pixel is formed [by] a plurality of individual elements. This claim is not supported by the specification because at page 20 last paragraph a pixel is described as being represented by a 4 by 4 matrix of individual elements which are driven at the same time depending upon the result of the interpolation processing, however, this portion of the specification does not describe controlling the number of "ON" elements in the 4 by 4 matrix where the number is based upon a desired gray scale level for that particular pixel. The specification describing figures 5a to 5c (pages 23-25) describe gray scale control of pixels, but, this description is silent as to controlling individual elements of a pixel to control the gray scale of that pixel. Various other embodiments are present in this applicantion [sic, application], but, none of them support claims 15 and 17. Appellants argue (Brief, pages 3 and 4) that: As claimed in claims 15 and 17, the method and apparatus merely combine using more than one element of the array per pixel and control the amount of time each element in the pixel is ON to achieve gray scale for that pixel. The method of pulse width modulation on page 23 is clearly stated as being 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007