THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KLAUS THOEREN ET AL.
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1620
Application No. 08/409,9591
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to the appellant's request for
rehearing of our decision mailed March 11, 1999, wherein we2,3
1Application for patent filed March 23, 1995. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/099,528, filed July 30, 1993, now
abandoned.
2Filed April 12, 1999.
3Effective Dec. 1, 1997, 37 CFR § 1.197(b) was amended to
change the term "reconsideration" to "rehearing." See the
final rule notice published at 62 Fed. Reg. 53131, 53197 (Oct.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007