Appeal No. 1997-1620 Page 2
Application No. 08/409,959
affirmed the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 and
21 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 and reversed the examiner's rejection of claims
9 to 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have carefully considered the argument raised by the
appellants in their request for rehearing, however, that
argument does not persuade us that our decision was in error in
any respect.
The argument (pp. 2-3) raised by the appellants is that
it is technically impossible to use a biaxially oriented film of
Janocha in a deep draw operation, since a biaxially oriented
film would inevitably shrink in such a deep draw operation.
We continue to find this argument unpersuasive for the
reasons set forth on page 8 of our earlier decision. That is,
while the evidence establishes that it was not technically
10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21,
1997)).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007