Appeal No. 97-1622
Application No. 08/109,179
estimating means for selecting an input case
corresponding to the similarity determined by said similarity
determination means from the extracted similar input case, and
estimating a value of output data corresponding to the new
input event on the basis of the mean value of the single
output data corresponding to the selected input case and the
mean value of change amounts of the single output data.
The examiner relied on the following references:
“Case-Based Reasoning,” Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency Information Science and Technology Office: Machine
Learning Program Plan, pp. 1-13 May 1989
Hanson 5,257,206 Oct. 26,
1993
Claims 1-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over “Case-Based Reasoning from DARPA: Machine
Learning Program Plan”, hereinafter referred to as DARPA, and
Hanson.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the
Examiner, reference is made to the briefs and answer for the 2
respective details thereof.
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-6 under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
2The Appeal Brief was filed March 11, 1996. In response
to the Examiner’s answer dated July 24, 1996, a Reply Brief
was filed Sept. 20, 1996 which was acknowledged and entered by
the Examiner without further comment on Oct. 16, 1996.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007