Appeal No. 1997-1636 Page 21 Application No. 08/204,996 For the foregoing reasons, the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claim 14. We end our consideration of the obviousness of the claims by noting that the aforementioned affirmances are based only on the arguments made in the brief. Arguments not raised in the brief are not before us, are not at issue, and are thus considered waived. CONCLUSION To summarize, the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed. Her rejection of claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007