THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HIROAKI NAKAI,
SHINICHI KOBAYASHI, MOTOHARU ISHII,
ATSUSHI OHBA, TOMOSHI FUTATSUYA
and AKIRA HOSOGANE
__________
Appeal No. 1997-1641
Application 08/352,1431
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, FLEMING and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5-7,
9, 12 and 13.
The invention pertains to a voltage regulator. Claim 1, the
only independent claim, is illustrative and reads as follows:
Application for patent filed December 1, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007