Ex parte NAKAI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-1641                                                        
          Application 08/352,143                                                      


          1.  A semiconductor device comprising:                                      
          first charge pump means for generating a first voltage of a                 
          first polarity,                                                             
          voltage generation means for generating a second voltage of a               
          second polarity differing from said first polarity,                         
          first voltage-dividing means for generating a third voltage                 
          of said second polarity by voltage-division from said first and             
          second voltages, and                                                        
          first control means for controlling an operation of said                    
          first charge pump means in response to a level of said third                
          voltage.                                                                    
          The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                   
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Cordoba et al. (Cordoba)     5,347,172                Sep. 13,              
          1994                                                                        
          Watsuji et al. (Watsuji)     5,432,738                Jul. 11,              
          1995                                                                        
          (filed Jan. 27,                                                             
          1994)                                                                       
          Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35                     
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Cordoba.                                   
          Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      
                                   2                                                  
          unpatentable over Cordoba .                                                 
          The respective positions of the examiner and the appellants                 
          with regard to the propriety of these rejections are set forth in           

          2Although Watsuji is referred to by the examiner in his explanation for the rejection of
          dependent claim 5, Watsuji is not included in the formal statement of the rejection of the
          claim.                                                                      
                                            2                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007