THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EKANAYAKE A. AMERASEKERA
and CHARVAKA DUVVURY
__________
Appeal No. 1997-1688
Application 08/515,7521
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH, and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 28-33, all
the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to an ESD protection circuit. Claim
28 is illustrative and reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed August 16, 1995. According to the appellants,
the application is a continuation of Application 08/242,925, filed May 16, 1994, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007