Ex parte SAMSEL - Page 1




                                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                             

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                           
                     journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 19                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                              
                                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                              
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                     Ex parte W. SCOTT SAMSEL                                                                                          
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                            Appeal No. 97-1871                                                                                         
                                                                         Application 08/325,8471                                                                                       
                                                                              ______________                                                                                           

                                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                                            
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                     Before CALVERT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                     

                     CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                             


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             

                                This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 18 and 20 to 32, all the claims remaining                                                    

                     in the application.                                                                                                                                               

                                The appealed claims are reproduced in Appendix I of appellant's brief.                                                                                 

                                The subject matter in issue is exemplified by claim 1:                                                                                                 


                                1Application for patent filed October 19, 1994.                                                                                                        
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007