Ex parte KARHUMAKI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-2019                                         Page 2           
          Application No. 08/430,196                                                  


          from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the                   
          appendix to the appellant's brief.                                          


                                   The References                                     
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Jordan                   786,127                  Mar. 28, 1905             
          Cuthbertson              3,827,087                Aug.  6, 1974             
          Ekman                    3,924,278                Dec.  9, 1975             
          Wakenshaw                     4,546,505                Oct. 15,             
          1985                                                                        
          Johansson                4,809,368           Mar.  7, 1989                  
                                   The Rejections                                     
               Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Ekman in view of Wakenshaw and                   
          Cuthbertson.                                                                
               Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Ekman, Wakenshaw and Cuthbertson as applied               
          to claim 1 above, and further in view of Johansson.                         















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007