Ex parte KARHUMAKI - Page 8




          Appeal No. 97-2019                                         Page 8           
          Application No. 08/430,196                                                  


                    complimentary cover 12.  Therefore, in                            
                    consideration of Jordan, it would have been                       
                    obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art                       
                    to associate a complementary cover with the                       
                    Ekman cover means in order to enable use of                       
                    the bathing apparatus for steam treatment.                        
                    [examiner’s answer at page 5].                                    
          Appellant argues that the cover means of Jordan does not                    
          disclose a first cover for partially covering the body and a                
          second complementary cover to cover the rest of the body                    
          because the Jordan cover means has a small hole for the neck                
          which allows the head to be outside the cover.                              
               In our view, the phrase “completely enclose said tub                   
          unit” is broad enough to include a tub unit with a cover and                
          complementary cover as disclosed in Jordan which encloses the               
          tub unit and has a small hole for the neck of the person                    
          bathing in the tub.  In this regard, we note that WEBSTER’S II              
          NEW RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY DICTIONARY (The Riverside Publishing               
          Company, 1984) defines “enclose” as “to surround on all                     
          sides.”  The cover 10 and complementary cover 12 disclosed in               
          Jordan certainly surrounds the tub unit on all sides                        
          notwithstanding the small hole for the neck of the bather.                  
               In view of the foregoing, the examiner’s rejection of                  
          claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will be sustained.                            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007