THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte W. WAYNE FREED
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2071
Application No. 08/336,5291
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 16, 18 through
29, 43 and 44, which are the only claims remaining in this
application.
1Application for patent filed November 9, 1994.
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/112,431, filed August 26, 1993, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007