THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DANIEL C. DUAN,
JAMES S. STEFELY, DAVID W. SCHULTZ,
and CHESTER L. LEACH
__________
Appeal No. 97-2174
Application 08/214,7631
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed March 16, 1994. According1
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/032,605, filed March 17, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007