THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIKAZU KAJI
____________
Appeal No. 97-2287
Application No. 08/299,1281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
2, 7 and 8. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 7),
claims 3 and 8 were amended. After submission of the
1Application for patent filed September 2, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007