THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte REGINALD T. CHARLSON
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2314
Application No. 08/349,7281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 6.
The disclosed invention relates to a video surveillance
security system for a vehicle that records video at one speed
based upon the door of the vehicle being in a closed position,
1Application for patent filed December 5, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007