Appeal No. 1997-2314
Application No. 08/349,728
a plurality of cameras after the occurrence of a specific
event, namely, the opening of a vehicle door.
In summary, we agree with appellant that it would take
impermissible hindsight to reach the conclusion that it would
have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to
record the “output signal of only said door camera at a second
playback speed” when the passenger door of the vehicle is
opened. The obviousness rejection of claims 1 through 6 is
reversed.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 6
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, Jr. )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007