THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SANDRA L. WOOD, THOMAS J. KUNDMANN, LEE M. PROCTOR
and KEN STEWART
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2380
Application No. 08/121,8091
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 14.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
in a communication system for determining whether received
frames of information are good or bad frames of information.
1Application for patent filed September 15, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007