Appeal No. 1997-2380 Application No. 08/121,809 According to the examiner (Answer, pages 3 and 4), “adaptive thresholding is well known in the art as disclosed by Fletcher et al.” Although “Fletcher in the discussion of a telemetry synchronizer discussed changing modes depending upon the number of good frames or bad frames of data received (see abstract and columns 6-7)” (Answer, page 4), Fletcher’s modes (i.e., lock, verify and search) (Figure 1; column 6, line 67 through column 7, line 13) do not include erasure of a frame of information. During the mode changes, only one threshold value (i.e., the output from threshold detector 34) is used by Fletcher, and the Fletcher telemetry synchronizer never switches from one threshold value to another threshold value. In other words, the other threshold detector 15 in Fletcher (Figure 1) is not used in conjunction with the threshold detector 34 to form two threshold values that are switched in and out of the synchronizer system based upon bad frame erasure/mode changes. We agree with appellants’ argument (Brief, pages 7 and 8) that the claimed first and second bit correction “thresholds used to make the determination of whether a frame of 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007