THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STANLEY W. OLSON ____________ Appeal No. 97-2481 Application No. 08/480,9641 ____________ HEARD: March 12, 1999 ____________ Before CALVERT, COHEN, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and 2, the only claims in the application. 1 Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 08/317,284, filed October 3, 1994, now U.S. Patent 5,489,220, issued February 6, 1996; which is a continuation of Application No. 08/053,486, filed April 28, 1993, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No. 07/968,694, filed October 30, 1992, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007