Ex parte SUGIE et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was     
               not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not            
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                               Paper No. 31           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
             Ex parte MASARU SUGIE, CHIAKI SEKIOKA, YOSHIAKI YANAGIDA,                
                  HISASHI UEMURA, MASAYUKI KUBOTA and HIROBUMI HAGA                   
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-2499                                  
                             Application No. 08/228,4491                              
                                    ____________                                      
                              HEARD:  November 16, 1999                               
                                    ____________                                      

          Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative                  
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                       
          examiner’s refusal to allow claims 7, 9, 11, 13 through 42, 44              
          through 50, and 52 through 71 which are all the claims                      

               Application for patent filed April 15, 1994.1                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007