THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 31 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MASARU SUGIE, CHIAKI SEKIOKA, YOSHIAKI YANAGIDA, HISASHI UEMURA, MASAYUKI KUBOTA and HIROBUMI HAGA ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2499 Application No. 08/228,4491 ____________ HEARD: November 16, 1999 ____________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 7, 9, 11, 13 through 42, 44 through 50, and 52 through 71 which are all the claims Application for patent filed April 15, 1994.1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007