THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD A. SHARMAN,
and PAUL S. ADAMS
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2541
Application 08/369,0221
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before BARRETT, LEE and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's rejection of claims 1-16. No claim has been
allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Pate, “Trends in multimedia applications and the network
models to support them,” Proceedings of IEEE Global
Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM ‘90), pp. 317-321,
12/02/90.
Application for patent filed January 5, 1995.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007