Appeal No. 97-2582
Application 08/484,353
distinction over the prior art. With regard to that aspect of
the appellants’ claimed invention, Ogawa, as applied by the
examiner, does not make up for the above-discussed
deficiencies of Kinoshita and Taguchi. Accordingly, the
rejection of claims 8-10 cannot be sustained.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 7 and 15-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Kinoshita and Taguchi is reversed.
The rejection of claims 8-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Kinoshita, Taguchi, and Ogawa is
reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007