THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN M. BLACKMON, BARRY A. FEIGENBAUM,
MARK A. FIECHTNER, JEFFREY T. GALEA,
ALLEN M. GILBERT, DAVID A. KERR, PAUL R.
KING, TATCHI P. LAY, IVAN LOMELLI,
DARREN M. MICLETTE, COLIN V. POWELL, GLENN T.
PUCHTEL and JONATHAN M. WAGNER
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2583
Application 08/156,9511
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's rejection of claims 12-17. No claim has been
allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Application for patent filed November 15, 1993. According to appellants, the1
application is a continuation of Application 07/860,826, filed March 31, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007