Appeal No. 97-2583 Application 08/156,951 which is shared by the host system and the control processor. Our reading of Longo reveals that the host system and the control processor do not draw pictures on the same display at the same time. In Longo’s column 12, lines 53-56, it is stated: There are two embodiments that allow both systems to access the screen 38 without destroying the previous screen contents once in operational mode i.e., loopback and control processor console emulation. In the loopback mode, no drawing is done directly by the control processor. See column 12, lines 59-64. Data for display is passed from the control processor back to the host system. Consequently, Longo states that in the loopback mode there is no need to arbitrate between the two bodies of software having access to the single piece of hardware. (Column 12, lines 64-66). In the control processor emulation mode, it appears that the control processor would direct display data to the screen through the rendering processor while the host is evidently halted, as has been argued by the appellants. See column 13, line 62 to column 14, line 17, and column 14, lines 58-64. In short, the examiner has not set forth a sufficient 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007