Ex parte THALLER et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1997-2652                                                        
          Application 08/385,509                                                      



          Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d              
          1452, 1458, 221 USPQ 481, 485 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                             
                    Appellants argue on pages 12 and 13 of the brief                  
          that Damon does not teach an apparatus comprising:                          
                    . . . a first printed circuit board                               
                    supporting a plurality of electrical                              
                    components, a first one of said plurality                         
                    of electrical components being mounted on a                       
                    first side of said first printed circuit                          
                    board . . . having holes therein, said                            
                    first electrical component having one or                          
                    more pins each passing through one of said                        
                    holes in said first printed circuit board                         
                    and each protruding from an opposite side                         
                    of said first printed circuit board. . . ;                        
                    and                                                               
                    . . . a second printed circuit board                              
                    having one or more holes and being mounted                        
                    . . . with said one or more pins of said                          
                    first electrical component protruding                             
                    through at least one of said holes in said                        
                    second printed circuit board, said second                         
                    printed                                                           
                    circuit board being vertically in alignment                       
                    with said first electrical component and                          
                    being comparably smaller in length and                            
                    width than said first printed circuit board                       
                    [emphasis added].                                                 
          Appellants argue that Damon does not teach a first printed                  
          circuit board and a second printed circuit board as recited in              
          Appellant's claim 10.                                                       

                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007