Appeal No. 97-2723
Application 08/320,091
The examiner relies on the following references:
Dummermuth et al. (Dummermuth) 4,442,504 Apr. 10, 1984
Klug et al. (Klug) 5,226,152 July 06, 1993
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, for failing to particularly point out and
distinctly claim the invention. Claims 2-7 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness the
examiner offers Dummermuth alone or Dummermuth in view of
Klug.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner, the arguments
in support of the rejections and the evidence of obviousness
relied upon by the examiner as support for the obviousness
rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007