Appeal No. 1997-2818
Application No. 08/322,370
In the final analysis, the only way the examiner could
have arrived at appellants’ claimed invention is through
hindsight based on appellants’ teachings. Hindsight analysis,
however, is clearly improper. In re Deminski, 796 F.2d 436,
443, 230 USPQ 313, 316 (Fed. Cir. 1986).
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007