THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID T. MAGILL and HOREN CHEN
____________
Appeal No. 97-2892
Application No. 08/274,5561
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 3. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 13),
claim 4 was amended to overcome the examiner’s objection to an
otherwise allowable claim.2
1Application for patent filed July 14, 1994.
2The record is silent as to whether or not the
Supplemental Amendment After Final (paper number 16) was
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007