Appeal No. 97-2907
Application 08/314,146
(Sweden)
The following rejections are before us for review.4
Claims 1, 3 through 10, 12, and 24 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Chang in view of
Handels.
Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Chang in view of Handels, as applied to
claim 1 above, further in view of Summons.
Claims 15 through 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Chang in view of Handels and
Loucony.
Claims 22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Chang in view of Handels, as applied
to claims 1 and 9 above, further in view of Hutton.
4A final rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, argued in the brief
(page 7), was not included in the answer, obviously in light of the entry of the
amendment after final rejection (Paper No. 12).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007