Appeal No. 97-2907
Application 08/314,146
Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Chang in view of Handels, as applied to
claim 9 above, further in view of Loucony.
Claim 26 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Chang.
Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Chang in view of Hutton.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response
to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer
(Paper No. 14 ), while the complete statement of appellant’s
argument can be found in the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos.
13 and 15).
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the obviousness issues
raised in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007