Appeal No. 1997-2964 Application No. 08/531,103 The appellant's invention is directed to a throttle valve arrangement for an internal combustion engine. The claims before us on appeal have been reproduced in an appendix to the Brief. THE REFERENCES The references relied upon by the examiner to support the final rejection are: Lamm 3,620,195 Nov. 16, 1971 Ishida et al. 4,462,358 Jul. 31, 1984 (Ishida) THE REJECTION Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lamm in view of Ishida. Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner’s full commentary with regard to the above-noted rejection and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the rejection, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper No. 7) for the reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the Appellant’s Brief (Paper No. 9), for the opposing viewpoints. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007