Ex parte GIORGIO et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 97-2982                                         Page 4           
          Application No. 08/219,554                                                  


               Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as obvious over Fischer in view of ANSI.  (Examiner’s Answer                
          at 3.)  Rather than repeat the arguments of the appellants or               
          examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the appeal and reply               
          briefs and the examiner’s answers for the respective details                
          thereof.                                                                    





                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered                 
          the  subject matter on appeal and the rejection and evidence                
          advanced by the examiner.  We also considered the appellants’               
          and examiner’s arguments.  After considering the record before              
          us, it is our view that the evidence and level of skill in the              
          art would not have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the                
          art the invention of claims 1 through 5.  Accordingly, we                   
          reverse.                                                                    


               We begin our consideration of the obviousness of the                   
          claims by recalling that in rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. §              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007