Appeal No. 97-3030 Application No. 08/254,181 will sustain this rejection. It is our view that Hawkins is merely cumulative to the teachings of Pons Pons because the latter already teaches the use of protruding metal prongs for insertion into a 120VAC wall outlet wherein the prongs are connected to the heating element. When adapting the porcelain enamel metal substrate of Hedden to the Pons Pons device as the heating element, it would have been obvious to the artisan that the connection from the power supply must be made to conductive strips of the porcelain enamel metal substrate in order to provide electrical power for heating the substrate. As far as the prongs being "mechanically connected" to the porcelain enamel metal substrate, the artisan would have been well aware of the equally obvious alternatives of either mechanically connecting the prongs, supplying the power, to the substrate, or electrically connecting the prongs to the substrate via conductive wire. Similarly, with regard to claim 8, although the applied references do not explicitly disclose rivets, the skilled artisan would have known that one of many equally obvious ways to make a mechanical connection, e.g., of prongs to the substrate, would have been the application of rivets. Clearly, the artisan must be presumed 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007