Appeal No. 1997-3104
Application 08/221,124
On page 5 of the brief, Appellant argues that
Moeller does not disclose a method of remotely processing an
API request
by a server rather than a client terminal. Appellant argues
that the term "server" clearly refers to a computer which
services an API request instead of the client terminal that
executes the application which produces the API request. On
pages 7 and 8 of the brief, Appellant further argues that
Moeller does not inherently teach a method of remotely
processing an API request by a server rather than a client
terminal.
We note that Appellant's claim 1 recites the method
for processing an API request generated by an application
program that is executed in a client terminal. Furthermore,
we note that Appellant's claim 1 recites: allocating a block
of operating memory by the client terminal; placing the data
and defining the client terminal API request in the block of
operating memory by the client terminal; sending the data and
instructions for creating the block of memory to the server
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007