Appeal No. 1997-3104
Application 08/221,124
However, we fail to find that Moeller teaches a method for
processing an API request generated by an application program
that is executing in a client terminal by a server as recited
in Appellant's claims 1 through 6.
In the Examiner's answer, the Examiner argues that
the method claimed by the Appellant is inherent to Moeller.
However, to establish inherency, the Examiner must show that
the missing descriptive matter is necessarily present in the
system described in the reference. We fail to find that the
Examiner has met this burden. In particular, Moeller's system
may be operated with the processors in parallel but we fail to
find the method in which one processor will interchange memory
data and instructions with another processor in the
particular method as recited in Appellant's claim.
Furthermore, we fail to find that Moeller must operate in this
way to perform his disclosed wrapper for
enabling an object-oriented application to maintain virtual
memory using procedural function calls.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007