Ex parte FERDINANDSEN, et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 97-3347                                                          
          Application No. 08/302,864                                                  



          he respective viewpoints of appellants and the examiner.  As a              
          consequence of our review, we make the determinations which                 
          follow.                                                                     


               We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claim 1.  It                    
          follows that we likewise reverse the rejection of claims 2                  
          through 8 since these claims stand or fall with claim 1, as                 
          previously indicated.                                                       


               As is quite evident from a reading of claim 1,                         
          appellants’ invention expressly requires a mask made from a                 
          thin sheet having “an opaque, peripheral region which, across               
          a transitional zone,  gradually fades out into a transparent,               
          central area.”                                                              


               We turn now to the examiner’s evidence of obviousness.                 


               We find that the patent to Sibley discloses a photograph               
          album leaf construction.  The leaf 10 comprises a single                    
          flexible sheet folded on itself to form front and back pages                

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007