Ex parte FERDINANDSEN, et al. - Page 9




                 Appeal No. 97-3347                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/302,864                                                                                                             

                 pervious to radiant energy (light).   It follows that the        4                                                                     
                 thin sheet of claim 1 is understood as having an opaque                                                                                
                 peripheral region in the sense that this region is not                                                                                 
                 pervious to light.  With this understanding, it is clear to                                                                            
                 this panel of the board that the recitation in claim 2 of                                                                              
                 “preferably 100%” relative to the coloration coverage renders                                                                          
                 this claim indefinite in meaning,   for the following reasons.                                                                         
                 5The term “preferably 100%” indicates to us that less than                                                                             
                 100% coverage in the peripheral region is intended to be                                                                               
                 encompassed within the scope of claim 2.                                                                                               
                 This would effect a peripheral region that is not opaque,                                                                              
                 inconsistent with the express requirement of parent claim 1.                                                                           
                 Accordingly, the content of claim 2 is appropriately rejected                                                                          
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.                                                                          


                          In summary, this panel of the board has:                                                                                      



                          4Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, G. & C. Merriam                                                                         
                 Company, Springfield, Massachusetts, 1979.                                                                                             
                          5As we understand the claimed invention, a coloration                                                                         
                 coverage of 100% in the peripheral region corresponds to an                                                                            
                 opaque peripheral region, since the coloration is gradually                                                                            
                 reduced to 0% at the central area (transparent).                                                                                       
                                                                           9                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007